{ "@context": "http:\/\/schema.org", "@type": "Article", "image": "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.noticiases.info\/wp-content\/s\/2024\/09\/RPE-L-CBUGRAD-0422-11MS_5bc587.jpg?w=150&strip=all", "headline": "Endorsement: No on flawed, poorly crafted Prop. 6", "datePublished": "2024-09-13 15:54:32", "author": { "@type": "Person", "workLocation": { "@type": "Place" }, "Point": { "@type": "Point", "Type": "Journalist" }, "sameAs": [ "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.noticiases.info\/author\/gqlshare\/" ], "name": "gqlshare" } } Skip to content
This shows a vigil held in Riverside in April to show  for victims of crime. (SCNG)
This shows a vigil held in Riverside in April to show for victims of crime. (SCNG)
Author
UPDATED:

Flawed if well-intentioned initiatives related to criminal justice are the norm in California politics. In 2016, at the behest of Gov. Jerry Brown, voters even approved a measure that cleared the way for the early release of some violent convicted sex offenders. Now another poorly crafted initiative is on the ballot. Proposition 6 would ban jails and prisons in the state from being able to force inmates to work.

But state Sen. Steve Glazer, D-Orinda, once student government president at San Diego State University, makes a powerful argument when he notes how that this would undermine the state’s commitment to victims’ rights by allowing prisoners to refuse to make court-ordered restitution payments. Glazer has been a common-sense voice for years. This is one more valuable example. Vote “no” on this purported reform.

Originally Published:

RevContent Feed

Events