{ "@context": "http:\/\/schema.org", "@type": "Article", "image": "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.noticiases.info\/wp-content\/s\/migration\/2022\/09\/28\/00000182-02cf-d911-a7ea-96ef67f80000.jpg?w=150&strip=all", "headline": "Hear both sides of Prop. 27: Allowing online sports betting throughout California", "datePublished": "2022-09-27 23:15:14", "author": { "@type": "Person", "workLocation": { "@type": "Place" }, "Point": { "@type": "Point", "Type": "Journalist" }, "sameAs": [ "https:\/\/sandiegouniontribune.noticiases.info\/author\/z_temp\/" ], "name": "Migration Temp" } } Skip to content

Hear both sides of Prop. 27: Allowing online sports betting throughout California

Get the story behind the story every day. Host Kristy Totten interviews Union-Tribune reporters, newsmakers and experts about what matters in San Diego.

00000182-02cf-d911-a7ea-96ef67f80000
[ “kleske, andrew” ]
Author
UPDATED:

Welcome to the San Diego News Fix. I’m Kristy Totten.This week the News Fix is focusing on California ballot measures.

Today you’ll hear more about Prop. 27, which would allow online and mobile sports betting outside of tribal lands. Fees from revenues would go to homeless services throughout the state.

The measure is funded by online betting companies FanDuel and DraftKings. It is ed by some advocates for the homeless and the mayors of Fresno, Oakland, Sacramento and Long Beach.

It is opposed by a long list of tribes and tribal casinos, the California Teachers Association and many others.

Both campaigns met with The San Diego Union-Tribune’s editorial board recently to share their perspectives and answer questions.

In this episode, you’ll first hear from Yes on 27, followed by No on 27.

Listen on the player above or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

You can find more election coverage here.

Originally Published:

RevContent Feed

Events